| « I See You... | Bad Apples » |
Watching GasLand
I finally broke down and watched it.
I'd heard about the documentary "GasLand" when it was released, but I had never rented it for few reasons. Pennsylvania's large-scale, industrial, natural gas development has been a topic I've been watching before it reached mainstream conversation. Primarily, as a writer I didn't want to be tempted to cite the movie, or quote it, or use its contents as an example of the looming abuse our environment was about to take at the hands of the energy industry. I already knew the horrors, and I wanted to remain an independent voice. Plus, I just didn't want to know any more.
Today, the terms hydraulic fracturing (a.k.a., fracking) and Marcellus Shale are no longer foreign ones to the general public, especially to those who live in Northeast PA. This is, in part, due to the wide circulation of this movie by concerned citizen groups as a means to wake people up to the seriousness of the issue. Another reason is the media attention given to our Governor Tom Corbett's refusal to properly charge the industry for the assets it is stealing from our natural resources bank.
GasLand is far from the only resource for information on how Shale drilling can destroy the ecological health of our most valuable, pristine areas. Well-told stories of ruined drinking water supplies have hit the New York Times (see "The Fracturing of Pennsylvania" by Eliza Griswold; November 17, 2011) while citizen action groups have popped up everywhere. Watchdogs, environmental regulators, scientists, and others -- armed with environmental studies -- have been battling for transparency since the first rig came to town.
Like mist cloaking a waterway, sometimes we can't see what is right in front of us.
A Battle for Fairness
Besides the environmental aspect, the corporate unfairness is overwhelming. America is subject to an ever-growing list of strict regulations in the name of clean air and water. Take for example how the entire automatic dish detergent industry must find an alternative to a key ingredient called phosphorus in their products because it pollutes our water. Yet, the natural gas industry seems to have free reign over what it takes and what it leaves behind, setting the scene for every advancement to be washed away in just a few years.
All this is happening at a time when our rivers and streams are finally healing from the coal-mining mistakes of our past. The movement that brought about the Clean Water Act occurred 40 years ago. Since many who witnessed the once-common environmental atrocities have now died, we've come to take the improvements for granted. It is assumed that you simply cannot pollute the air or water without accountability today.
New technology, in the hands of aggressive wealth seekers, has made that a very dangerous assumption.
Look closely to see; there's an eagle in that tree -- another reminder of how far we've come.
The Courage to Watch
As much as I wanted to shout from the mountaintops, I never had the courage fight the atrocities with any real fervor. Josh Fox, GasLand's creator, has become a hero of sorts to environmental advocates like me because he not only had the courage to shout, he had the courage to investigate in the first place. He now appears at key press conferences, public meetings, and movie screenings because he is a human being who -- if the development comes to his neighborhood -- will suffer emotional pain that is possibly greater than my own.
So my essays were written; a few articles were submitted for publication; and the population learned from numerous sources what Marcellus Shale meant. It was time to watch the movie.
I rented it from Netflix and watched it from my comfortable couch in my warm, heated home. I had to turn it off halfway through, to take a little break. An overwhelming sadness hit me when it was over just as I had expected.
Now it's a few days later. I've had a chance to recover ... a little. I find myself wondering how Josh goes on. Knowing first-hand the people whose lives have been destroyed by this quest has got to take a toll on a person, especially a hippie like Josh. Meanwhile, that old panic I felt when the Lehigh Valley Audubon Society first told me about the Marcellus Shale has returned once again.
Remembering What I Can Do
Personally, I haven't vacationed in any of my favorite beautiful places such as the mountains of northern and north central Pennsylvania since I first learned of the issue. Sullivan, Bradford, or Luzerne counties are now places I avoid for fear that my mental state will take a dive at first witness of thousands of tanker trucks rolling through the woods or at the sight of a freshly cut gas well access road.
Then I thought about the one place I can still go: the Delaware river. The Delaware is a unique river for many ecological reasons, but all you need to do is visit it one time to understand its value. The headwaters to the Delaware are in the Catskill Mountains of New York. I've long heard about New York's award-winning attention to its natural drinking water supply -- an effort made famous by good old Pete Seeger.
My husband and I and our rented canoe near Lackawaxen, PA.
New York's government had already had banned new Marcellus Shale drilling when I first learned of the issue. Before any new wells were permited, they wanted to get a better handle on the environmental impacts of the violent process (and all its byproducts) required to reach the natural gas far beneath our feet. Fortunately for us who live near Philadelphia, New York's action was helping to protect the supply for all 15 million water drinkers who rely on the Delaware.
Anyone who has learned about stream ecology knows just how important protection of the headwaters -- the place where a river starts -- is to a river. It's like the care and feeding of an infant; what you do at the beginning will impact it for the rest of its life.
However, New York's ban won't last forever. And when the Delaware flows into Pennsylvania, it isn't guarded by that award-winning foresight. The geological formation that holds the gas reaches under the northern section of the Delaware in Pennsylvania -- under the most beautiful sections of its 330-mile expanse; under the place where Josh Fox lives.
Simply put, toxic chemicals or high volumes of salt must NEVER enter the Delaware River. As expected, I started grappling with how to turn despair into action. I can't fight big business. I can't get the world to stop consuming energy. I can't argue against job creation. I can't break open a cover up.
Then it came to me: there are others -- like Fox -- doing what I cannot. I don't have to learn how to defeat a giant; I can support those who already have the weapons, armor, and know-how. One of those armies is called the Delaware Riverkeeper Network (DRN).
For now, there are no wells in the Delaware River watershed, thanks in part to the DRN-lead public pressure placed on the Delaware River Basin Commission. Since the push to drill and pipe the Delaware Watershed will not be going away, we need a Riverkeeper to stay on guard.
Along the river at the Roebling Inn in Lackawaxen, PA.
DRN stands up to the bullies, even fighting them in court when necessary. But they can't do that without money. If you love the Delaware River like I do, I encourage you to support this organization. You can learn more about them at www.delawareriverkeeper.org.
For Readers Near and Far
The Marcellus and Utica Shale formations have spawned natural gas development in nearly half the states in the country. The Delaware is only one of thousands of waterways that need protection from poisoning. Please don't hide behind the hopes that someone else will stop the absurdity of going backwards to an era of environmental pollution -- send a gift or volunteer to help out a trustworthy, local organization that is fighting for you.
Then, pray if you pray. Scream if you scream. Cry if you cry. Do what ever you have to to work through the emotions that are stirred up when you watch a film like GasLand. Just don't pretend it isn't happening. The Earth needs you to care -- no matter how painful that caring can be.
Trackback address for this post
Trackback URL (right click and copy shortcut/link location)
13 comments
Thanks for the support, Claudia. It means a lot to me as I'm sure it does to others who are reading this and doing what they can. I'm scared of our (this country's... the world's) thirst for energy. When denied energy (eg. electricity), people tend to show the ugly side of human, that desperate side of someone trying to survive when confronted with the absence of something that they have become accustom to as “always” being there. I've seen it first hand, I live it every time the electricity is lost to the masses for more that a period of time that is best described as an mere inconvenience.
I mention all this because I am an apathetic, middle-of-the-roader type of person most of the time. Then there are the times I want so desperately to join the cause, to pick up the fallen banner that defines the quest and march on to champion the “I want to do right thing” cause! But alas, I usually just think about the noble deed of which I aspire to and then turn up the thermostat, shut off the lights and crawl into bed, in a bedroom that is kept warm and lighted when I wish, by energy!
So this is my way of screaming (because I don't pray and I won't cry)... my way of joining the cause, my attempt of picking up the banner. I WILL support organizations that support the environment over those that support the energy companies although that may be counter productive to my vocation, but what the hell, the energy companies will survive, it will just cost them a little more money to do things the right way! I encourage all you other middle-of-the-roaders, average “Joes” to get off of your couches and support those that as Ruth says, “already have the weapons to take on the giant!
Faith: Thank you for being a Riverkeeper. You are in the trenches for all of us.Mike: You are an inspiration. You are in the energy business yet can see consumption as a problem. Your perspective is valuable to me because I don't believe the energy development issue has to be "us against them." I don't want this country to invest a single dollar in generation that dramatically scars the Earth, yet it still does, all the while we are told that alternative solutions are too expensive and not worthy of investment. They've back us into a corner with their lies.
The presentation in which I learned about Marcellus was SUPPOSED to be about wind farms and their impact on birds, but the presenters were so upset about Marcellus, they diverted much of the evening's program. When they came back to the topic of wind, they described monsterous turbines that were so large they require power to get spinning as well as woodland cuts for mountaintop access roads, etc. etc., Suddenly I was being told to fight against wind power -- a solution I'd be hoping for 30 years! What was going on? Then the common denominator revealed itself: large-scale industry. Solar panels on rooftops in Arizona or small wind turbines in fields in Kansas, or switchgrass pelletizers on farms in Pennsylvania would be investments I could get behind; ones that I might feel less guilty about when I crawl into my warm bed, but they're not the kind of thing that would make large-scale industry any money. The wealth would be spread around far too thin for them to let any of that happen.
We energy consumers have been put into the position of "us against energy" because of large-scale industry, and as a result we have also become unreasonable. We now expect that the lights MUST stay on EVERYWHERE because we are out of touch with what it takes to keep them that way. When I chop wood to feed my wood burner, I conserve the wood I burn. When we generate; we conserve. Simple as that.
I support you in your courage to demand a different way, even when your livelihood depends on it. You too are in the trenches.
Joy: awareness can be as beautiful as it is painful. Fill yourself with the beautiful things to find strength to fight the painful ones.
Together we will overcome this threat to our watershed and work towards a national fracking ban.
Thanks Andrew. I must correct my post; I did think I'd been hearing about GasLand for two years, but when I researched the Website, I saw that it was released in 2011. Regardless of the actual date, it feels like it's been forever. Much has transpired since .... as evident by TWO MARATHONS! Wow. (note to all readers: Click on Andrew's name to get to his site: www.andrewmcrath.com)
I think it is also worthwhile to note that DRN has been working to protect the Delaware for many years, against many threats. It can be exhausting to think of how difficult it is to preserve such a gem, but it also proves the Delaware's value. The savviest thieves target the jewels that are most rare. Thank you for all that you do protect American's true wealth.
XXO j
Thanks Janet. Sadly, there are so many threats it would cripple my sanity to learn about them all. I have to stick to the ones closest to my heart. Someone once asked me, if I could choose just one issue, what would it be? My answer: wilderness protection. Even if we never set foot in them, expansive natural areas contribute to our quality of life in ways we cannot quantify. We have to leave places on the globe unharmed so nature can be nature. As commenter Joy said, "The wildlife, human ecology, and our home is at stake!"
And hats off to you to remaining open to learning.
Michael: Thank you for posting. A good friend of mine sent me this story a few weeks ago: http://winonadailynews.com/news/local/article_485a2cea-4faa-11e1-b261-0019bb2963f4.html
This truly is an issue of national proportions. I'm sorry to learn of one person struggling with it, but I am glad you shared your voice here. Let us know what you think of the movie.
am using net for posts, thanks to web.




